Mark Twain famously complained in 1897, when a false rumour
spread widely, “Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated”. We laugh
away this error and enjoy Twain’s quip. For generations we have blithely
assumed that “The truth will out”, that, no doubt after some delay, a trail
will be discovered connecting one event with its perpetrator(s) and an
undisputed “fact” will be proven. This easy assumption probably no longer holds
good. Governments and politicians have long distorted, twisted and managed
information but now everyone plays this unholy game – the conventional media,
oppositions globally, the criminal classes, preening technologists and
unregulated social media. The luckless citizen hardly knows where to turn if he
wants to know if this or that assertion is objectively true – he struggles
through a jungle of fabrication, a miasma of doubt and a swamp of
contradiction. Mark Twain would not see anything to joke about.
Mark Twain
(1835-1910)
I naively once supposed that lies would never emanate from
The President of the United States. Remember the George Washington myth and his
hatcheting of his father’s cherry-tree? “I cannot tell a lie” declared
6-year-old Saint George. Well, many Presidents have declined to answer pointed
questions and have been at least “economical with the truth”. Richard Nixon
(Watergate passim) and Bill Clinton
(Monica Lewinsky passim) have told
blatant whoppers. Barack Obama seemed reasonably straight in the revered
tradition but his successor Donald Trump would not recognise the truth if it
floated in his soup.
Would you buy a second-hand car from these guys? |
In fact this disassociation of truth from event pre-dates
Trump by very many years. W. Randolph Hearst notoriously helped precipitate the
Spanish-American War of 1898 by claiming in his popular newspapers that the
sinking of the US battleship the Maine
in Havana harbour was the work of the Spanish. This was “fake news” as no cause
of the Maine explosion was ever
found. The strains of the Great War added to the wall of lies. Alleged
atrocities by the Germans on Belgian nuns were luridly reported in the British
press but were found to be false. British official propaganda exaggerated
indiscriminate U-boat torpedoing (e.g. the Lusitania
sinking) and had a marked effect on moving US public opinion towards
entering the War. In reaction, in the 1920s and 1930s stories about atrocities
in Turkey, famine in India and, tragically, re-armament and cruel persecution
in Nazi Germany took time to gain credence. Hence the horror when the grim
reality emerged after the war.
WW2 saw techniques in fake news develop rapidly. Goebbels
had seized upon The Big Lie – a constantly repeated large-scale lie that can
eventually be believed – pretending that the Jews were aiming at world
domination, thus justifying their ruthless elimination. In Russia, with no
government tradition of veracity anyway, Stalin lied about all and everything,
war aims, casualties, military progress, seeing deadly enemies of the state in
even the most muted critics, who paid a fatal price.
Fast forward to the self-righteous but flabby democracies of
the EU and the UK in 2017. The Brexit process has given birth to a mountain of
misinformation and distortion. The referendum campaign saw the Brexiteers claim
that leaving will free up £350 million weekly to spend instead on the NHS.
The Leave campaign persisted with this story even when the Office of National
Statistics warned this figure was seriously misleading as it ignored
counteracting exemptions. The Remainers unleashed a flood of scare stories
forecasting balance of payment collapse, industrial paralysis, regional unrest
and a mass exodus of talent – none of which has happened. Even after the
democratic Leave vote was confirmed, a chorus of gloom and doom still emanates
from the Remainers, egging on the EU to inflict as much damage as possible – a
strange stance for presumably loyal citizens to take. The Brexit “negotiations”
are not going well as the EU is not negotiating in good faith – it has no
interest in a deal and seeks only to achieve revenge for the UK daring to defy
the EU diktat. All this merely
strengthens Leaver resolve.
So Brussels trades in lies, disseminated by unofficial
briefings, last minute staged delays, which had so demoralised the Greeks, and
hypocritical assertions of friendship. Is it true that a hollow-cheeked, wild-eyed
Theresa May pleaded for help from Juncker to save her from the hard-exit
Tories? The gloss on this (no doubt meaning to appeal to daughter of the
rectory, Theresa) that there is strength in weakness (2 Corinthians 12:9) would
not butter many parsnips here in Folkestone and merely seems abject. The author
of this tale is said to be Juncker’s eminence
grise Martin Selmayr, known in Brussels as “The Monster”.
The Brexit talks are covered in deceit: the US President has
no credibility: what hope is there for clarity and logic in resolving
Catalonia’s differences with Spain or the political future of Syria? Public
opinion is too tolerant of falsehood – now there’s a good cause to be tackled
by social media. How wonderful it would be at last to breathe pure air, see
clear skies and hear honest dialogue!
SMD
29.10.17
Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2017