We live in a very dangerous world and in the easy-going West
we underestimate these dangers at our peril. I believe we need to raise our
guard higher, particularly currently against Militant Islam, a ferocious and
fanatical enemy of all our values. International politics is not a gentlemanly,
diplomatic game; it is a deadly struggle for survival played out with daily
car-bombs and slaughter in Middle Eastern cities, co-ordinated terror attacks
on America on 9/11 and murder and mayhem in London on 7/7. Effective response
to these threats requires a policy framework and I support “The Three Cs” –
Containment, Commonality and Covert Action.
Containment is an old chestnut and was the keystone of the
historically very effective US and NATO reaction to Militant Communism from
1946 onwards. A Communist bloc existed, but it was to get no larger.
Encroachments into Western Europe, South Korea, Indo-China, Malaysia and the
Middle East were to be resisted by backing existing regimes and a cordon sanitaire spun around the seat of
infection. After a bitter Cold War, the Soviet bloc and the USSR had collapsed
by 1991. If need be, Containment could lead to military intervention – not always
successful, as in tragic Vietnam.
Dulles, Apostle of Containment |
Reagan, Victor of Containment |
At this time, Containment should see the West supporting
General Sisi against the Muslim Brotherhood’s Morsi. A stable, economically
functioning Egypt is in our strategic interest. Despite the hand-wringing by
Robert Fisk in The Independent about
the betrayal of “Democracy” and the selective sympathy of the Left and the
tender-hearted in general for the victims of street fighting, those people in
Egypt who have a stake in the country recognise the Brotherhood as the menace
it has always been since the 1920s. Its suppression, which will inevitably
involve bloodshed, is an objective to be pursued with all determination and it
is only a matter of time before the Brotherhood is again proscribed and the
raucous mobs of ignorant fellahin supporting
it are silenced.
The Arab Spring has stimulated many Islamist parties and the
West should, as part of Containment, pour resources and treasure into those elements
pursuing a broadly secularist agenda in Tunisia, Libya, Iraq, Lebanon and
Syria; so too further East in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The cry always goes up
that the West is thus “interfering in the internal affairs” of the country in
question. Well, we have our own interests to protect and will resist our sworn
enemies however we can, accepting that local politics can be many-faceted and
obscure.
Most regimes and probably most of the inhabitants of the
Muslim world are not aggressive internationally. There are pariah regimes in Iran, Yemen and Somalia which need constant
surveillance and a presumption of evil-intent towards the West. Wealthy Saudi
Arabia harbours many of the most deadly enemies of the West and promotes Wahabi
medieval values; its financial inter-dependence with the West makes it a
special, oddly anachronistic case. Fortunately it is a doughty enemy of Shia
Iran, whose nuclear programme must soon be eradicated.
Free movement of people between the Muslim and Western world
is an impossible luxury and the visa process should be strenuously thorough and
a real obstacle. Troublemakers who slip through the net and get to Britain
should be instantly removed on the traditional grounds that “their presence is
not conducive to the public good”. This is an executive matter and the past
complaints of the fetid swarm of “human rights” lawyers like Cherie Blair and
the pompous intervention of judges like Lords Hoffman and Steyn, circumscribing
action against terrorism, all add to the argument that the UK should reform its
human rights legislation and withdraw from the European Convention on Human
Rights. Fortunately energetic Theresa May, current Home Secretary, has pushed
forward the deportation of several notorious Islamist agitators including Abu
Hamza and Abu Qatada.
Abu Hamza, preacher of Hate |
Abu Qatada, roving ambassador for Al-Qaeda |
Containment of Britain’s own home-grown terrorists is a
trickier matter; the perpetrators of the London carnage of 7/7 were all
British-born. First stop is the full force of the normally adequate Law. If the
Law is ineffective or too slow, the government has other weapons usable in an
emergency, most obviously Internment without Trial, with appropriate
safeguards. It was used against suspected Irish terrorists, so why not against the Muslim
variety? A confined sojourn in the Isle of Man would be salutary, with the more
dangerous specimens quarantined somewhere more remote, like St Kilda.
My 2nd “C” is Commonality. This means the
rewarding of moves by previously hostile regimes towards what we in the West
call “civilised values”. First priority is the rule of law and respect for
property and personal rights. Freedom of worship is another requirement,
noticeably absent in many Muslim counties. Women’s rights are routinely flouted
in the name of religion, not to mention the misery of forced marriages and the
obscenity of female circumcision. Progress on the elimination of these
practices can earn reciprocal benefits. Pressures of these kind can be very
fruitful in changing the face of our erstwhile enemies. Critics will say that
the assumption of Western superiority is arrogant and patronising. Well, we are
where we are, and the evidence of the lead of the West in technology, in
culture, in the creation of wealth and in the establishment of contented
societies is frankly overwhelming. The West is far from perfect but let us not
allow the mote in our own eye obscure the beam in the eye of our opponents.
The final “C” is Covert Action. Our government has an obligation
to defend us in whatever way necessary, without being mealy-mouthed and trying
to abide by some notional Marquess of Queensbury Rules. These attacks may be
cyber-warfare or old-fashioned subversion of hostile states. Sometimes our
enemies simply need to be eliminated and the US deploys its Special Forces and
the UK its SAS. The assassination of Saudi Osama Bin Laden by the US is a case
in point and the use of unmanned drones to decapitate Al Qaeda’s leadership,
including US citizen Anwar al-Awlaki, has been extremely successful.
Osama Bin Laden, eliminated |
Anwar al-Awlaki, eliminated |
These Covert Action methods probably do not stand up to
judicial examination – they are simply illegal under international law. One of
history’s baffling mysteries is the failure of Western intelligence agencies to
put a bullet into the brains of Hitler and Stalin in the 1930s. “Oh No!” I hear,
“that would be shamefully illegal!” Tell that to the Polish officers dragged
into the forest at Katyn, the French villagers put up against a wall at Oradour or
the Jewish mothers made to face the horrors of Auschwitz. What a vast scale of
human suffering would have been averted!
I hope against hope that Cameron and Hague, Obama and Kerry
and other Western leaders can be relied upon to resist our enemies with bold
initiative and magisterial decisiveness.
SMD
19.08.13
Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment