Our Lilliputian political struggles lend themselves to
the attention of poetic satire, an almost forgotten art, but one that
flourished gloriously from the mid-17th to the mid-18th
centuries, purveyed by three masters in ascending order of brilliance, Samuel
Butler, John Dryden and Alexander Pope.
What fun they would have had at the expense of May, Boris, Hammond and
Moggie, diverted by Corbyn, Barnier and Juncker and a preening galère of bit-players like Tusk,
Sturgeon, Soubry and Macron! They would all be skinned alive.
Samuel Butler |
John Dryden |
Alexander Pope |
Samuel
Butler (1613-1680) came from a quietly Anglican farming
family in Worcestershire. After the Restoration of the monarchy under Charles
II, he worked as a clerk to the gentry and briefly for the 2nd Duke
of Buckingham but was not received at court.
Like all England he had wearied of Puritan zealotry and he expressed his
dislike in the epic mock heroic poem Hudibras,
which became highly popular.
Such as do build their Faith upon
The holy Text of Pike and Gun;
Decide all Controversies by
Infallible Artillery;
And prove their Doctrine Orthodox
By Apostolic Blows and Knocks;
Call Fire and Sword and Desolation,
A godly-thorough-Reformation,
Which always must be carried on,
And still be doing, never done:
As if Religion were intended
For nothing else but to be mended.
The holy Text of Pike and Gun;
Decide all Controversies by
Infallible Artillery;
And prove their Doctrine Orthodox
By Apostolic Blows and Knocks;
Call Fire and Sword and Desolation,
A godly-thorough-Reformation,
Which always must be carried on,
And still be doing, never done:
As if Religion were intended
For nothing else but to be mended.
This broadside against sectarianism and
the futility of religious wars still resonates in our world defaced by Irish intransigence, Syrian blood-lust and
Islamic extremism.
A more
commanding figure than Butler is John
Dryden (1631-1700), a man of many parts, poet, dramatist, translator and
critic. In the genre of political
satire none surpasses his mock-heroic epic Absalom
and Achitophel of 1681. Outwardly a biblical narrative, in fact it is an
allegory of the perilous intrigues surrounding Charles II. David is Charles II,
Absalom is his illegitimate son the Duke of Monmouth, Achitophel the devious
Earl of Shaftsbury and Zimri is the erratic rake the 2nd Duke of
Buckingham. Dryden’s portrait of Shaftsbury is devastating.
Of
these the false Achitophel was first:
A
name to all succeeding ages curst.
For
close designs, and crooked counsels fit;
Sagacious,
bold and turbulent of wit:
Restless,
unfixt in principles and place;
In
pow'r unpleas'd, impatient of disgrace.
A
fiery soul, which working out its way,
Fretted
the pigmy-body to decay:
And
o'er inform'd the tenement of clay.
A
daring pilot in extremity;
Pleas'd
with the danger, when the waves went high
He
sought the storms; but for a calm unfit,
Would
steer too nigh the sands, to boast his wit.
Dryden had already made an enemy of Buckingham and
meted out a strikingly hostile appraisal of that gentleman’s character:
A man so various, that he seemed to be
Not one, but all mankind’s epitome:
Stiff in opinions, always in the wrong;
Was everything by starts, and nothing long;
But, in the course of one revolving moon,
Was chemist, fiddler, statesman and buffoon.
Not one, but all mankind’s epitome:
Stiff in opinions, always in the wrong;
Was everything by starts, and nothing long;
But, in the course of one revolving moon,
Was chemist, fiddler, statesman and buffoon.
Dryden’s own loyalties were erratic: reared a Puritan, he became
influenced by High Anglicanism, switching from support of the Commonwealth to
enthusiasm for monarchy. He became the first Poet Laureate in 1668, a royal
appointment, and eventually became a Catholic, welcoming James II. Expelled
from Court on the accession of Protestant William and Mary in 1688, Dryden
still made
an honourable living as a writer and he was accorded full funereal privileges
on his death in 1700, being eventually interred at Westminster Abbey.
How much we miss a poet
of Dryden’s calibre to prick the bubble of the political classes in Britain and
Europe in the Brexit battle!
Our third poet is Alexander Pope (1688-1744) a central
figure in the Augustan Age and a poet of surpassing genius. Pope was the son of
a London linen merchant and suffered various handicaps. He was born and
remained a Catholic, subjected to discrimination under the Test Acts, unable to
live in his own London and barred from many employments. He suffered from
Pott’s Disease, tuberculosis of the spine, and was hunchbacked and of stunted
growth, only reaching 4ft 6in. Unable to attend university, he was largely
self-taught and absorbed a profound knowledge of ancient literature. He had the
gift of friendship and came to know many people in literary circles; he was an
excellent letter-writer and he charmed and delighted his various
correspondents, many of them female.
Poetry was very different
in those days. The poet was an upholder of standards, often those of the
ancients, and his output was openly didactic. Thus Pope in his Essay on Criticism stated:
A
little learning is a dang’rous thing,
Drink
deep or drink not of the Pierian Spring.
Similarly in Pope’s An Essay on Man he declared:
Know then thyself: presume not God to scan
The proper study of Mankind is Man.
No modern poet would involve himself in such subjects. To us
poetry is not now a narrative media, nor a handbook on morals or good taste. We
most associate poetry with the untamed ego, our passionate or violent senses, with
our inner struggles or self-conscious descriptions of natural beauty. But all
of that did not really come in until the late 18th century, with
Scott, Wordsworth and Byron.
Pope’s mastery of the heroic couplet was most
evident in his astonishingly ambitious translations of Homer, not at all like the atmosphere of the ancient Greeks, but
redolent of the civilised drawing rooms of Augustan England.
The most accessible and the most popular of
Pope’s works is his mock-heroic The Rape
of the Lock of 1712 making a drama of the unconsented snipping of a lock of
hair from Belinda’s mane by an ardent admirer.
Aubrey Beardsley's illustration in 1892 of The Rape of the Lock |
What dire offence from am'rous causes
springs,
What mighty contests rise from trivial
things,
I sing—This verse to Caryl, Muse! is due:
This, ev'n Belinda may vouchsafe to view:
Slight is the subject, but not so the praise,
If she inspire, and he approve my lays.
He sets the scene with humour and wit: His mastery of the
heroic couplet, his exquisite choice of words and the easy sophistication of
his narrative recommends Pope to his readers. The satire is gentle but Pope
could be cutting in his derision – see The
Dunciad – and not for nothing was Pope known as The Wasp of Twickenham. But
allow him to close in a relatively mellow vein.’
Close by those meads, for ever crown'd with flow'rs,
Where Thames with pride surveys his rising
tow'rs,
There stands a structure of majestic frame,
Which from the neighb'ring Hampton takes its
name.
Here Britain's statesmen oft the fall
foredoom
Of foreign tyrants and of nymphs at home;
Here thou, great Anna! whom three realms
obey,
Dost sometimes counsel take—and sometimes
tea.
SMD
10.03.2018
Text
Copyright © Sidney Donald 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment