Only in recent months have I caught up with two excellent
films which I would term “patriotic cinema” namely Dunkirk and Darkest Hour.
Both were 2017 releases – I am often well behind the pack in such matters! My
definition of patriotic cinema is a stirring, inspirational production
celebrating national values and national courage peppered with a discreet soupçon
of flag-waving. I will return to the two recent efforts presently but would
like to mention some earlier films which qualify under my definition.
The US is the leading world film-maker and the war film is a
well-established genre. But even the thoughtful and moving epic All Quiet on the Western Front (1930)
with Lew Ayres is not quite the genuine article as it carries a strong anti-war
and anti-nationalist message. At the other extreme, films like The Battle of the Bulge, The Longest Day or Patton, whatever their merits, concentrate on their war narrative
and do not allow the audience to draw its own conclusions.
My favourite patriotic cinema piece emanating from the US is
the 1946 The Best Years of our Lives directed
by William Wyler featuring Fredric March, Dana Andrews and Harold Russell as
three returning servicemen facing problems in post-war civilian life. Banker
March is reprimanded as being too generous in his help for veterans, cuckolded
Andrews cannot progress from his dead-end soda-jerk job in a drugstore and
Russell, an amateur actor who actually had prosthetic hands, fears his injuries
are a handicap to his love for his girl.
Harold Russell, Teresa Wright, Dana Andrews, Myrna Loy and Fredric March |
In the end March is vindicated, Andrews finds a new wife and
a good job and Russell gets his girl in a paean to the uplifting generosity of
US society which so heartened the world after 1945. The film is a tribute to
all the positive aspects of the American Dream.
France produced a marvellous soldierly film in La Grande Illusion (1937) directed by
Jean Renoir but it was rather an examination of class solidarity and of the
shared values of the dying aristocracies of France and Germany. It was more
intelligently reflective than stirring.
It actually fell to the USSR to produce a pre-war patriotic
cinema masterpiece to stir its audience under the expert cinematic direction of
Sergei Eisenstein of The Battleship
Potemkin fame. The 1938 historical drama Alexander Nevsky with Nikolai Cherkasov in the title role and
rousing music from Sergei Prokofiev entranced Soviet audiences. The film was
eerily prophetic as it chronicles the invasion of Kievan ‘Rus by the crusaders
of the Teutonic Knights with their Estonian auxiliaries and their attacks on
Pskov as a stronghold of Eastern Orthodoxy. The film’s highlight is its
historically dubious version of the 1242 Battle on the Ice (Lake Piepus),
carefully choreographed as the ice shatters and the Teutonic Knights drown. A
parallel was drawn between the Nazis and the Teutonic Knights (whose priests are
adorned with swastikas in the movie.)
Battle on the Ice from Eisenstein's Alexander Nevsky |
The film was suddenly withdrawn in September 1939 on the
signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact but returned to Soviet screens after the Nazi
invasion of Russia in June 1941. It was a great and much-needed morale-booster.
Dame May Whitty and young Miniver sing Onward Christian Soldiers |
Britain’s film industry was trying to raise morale at home
too but ironically the most successful production was American, Mrs Miniver with Greer Garson and Walter
Pigeon, directed in 1942 by William Wyler (again!). It pressed all the right
buttons in its depiction of a Thames-side middle-class English couple with
three sons, one an RAF pilot. He falls for the grand-daughter (Teresa Wright)
of the formidable Lady of the Manor (Dame May Whitty). Pigeon does his bit,
heroically picking up soldiers from Dunkirk in his pleasure boat, an injured
German pilot is disarmed and tended by Garson, air raids kill local characters
and the beloved newly-married Teresa dies from injuries. The church is open to
the sky but the vicar preaches an inspirational address with the congregation
singing Onward Christian Soldiers as
the RAF fly overhead in a V-formation. An uplifting stiff-upper-lip tribute -
they don’t make them like that anymore!
Dunkirk (2017),
directed by Christopher Nolan is an Anglo-American-Dutch co-production with an
ensemble cast which nevertheless includes Kenneth Branagh, Mark Rylance and Tom
Hardy. Its episodic narrative runs together three stories on land, sea and in
the air. You see no Germans nor any politicians back in London and the dialogue
is sparse. Yet you understand the raw courage and discipline of the queues of
soldiers on the beach awaiting evacuation, sitting ducks for dive-bombers. You
see the out-numbered Spitfires challenging the enemy and persevering in their
task. Most of all you admire the large and small ships under fire and
delivering a miracle.
Defeated soldiers awaiting salvation at Dunkirk |
The film follows the fortunes of a flight of 3 Spitfires as
one is shot down, a second ditches in the Channel to be rescued by Mark
Rylance, while the third flown by Farrier (Tom Hardy) destroys a bomber
attacking a laden minesweeper, before running out of fuel, landing on the
Dunkirk beach outside the perimeter and being captured. Commander Bolton
(Kenneth Branagh) controls ships on the mole, constantly attacked by Stuka
dive-bombers striking fear and death into the soldiers. Mark Rylance (Mr
Dawson) steers his pleasure boat with his son and a local lad across the
Channel and rescues a shell-shocked soldier who wants only to go home. He is
angered when the boat makes for France and has to be restrained, striking the
local lad, who later dies. They get through to the beaches with other boats and
fill up with soldiers. Rather quietly the strains of Elgar’s Nimrod are heard on the sound-track as
they all make it to a proud welcome in England and read Churchill’s great
Dunkirk oration. Then the boatmen get back to their usual business.
I did not think the film struck any false notes and I found
it stimulating and inspirational.
Darkest Hour is a
more controversial film as it takes some historical liberties and makes several
omissions. The star, producing an electrifying performance as hyper-energetic,
defiant and difficult Winston Churchill is Gary Oldman.
Gary Oldman as Winston Churchill |
The action takes place as Churchill is appointed Prime Minister by an unenthusiastic George VI after a Commons vote against Neville Chamberlain, who remains party leader. Military disaster in Norway is followed by a deteriorating situation in France as the Blitzkrieg storms through. The inner core of the Tory party is hostile and Churchill tries to rally the outer reaches and backbenchers with some success. Halifax, the Foreign Secretary, favours a negotiated peace with the Nazis, brokered by Mussolini, but Churchill is adamantly opposed. He goes on a Tube journey to fathom what ordinary people feel – they favour resistance (this is a ludicrous scene). Encouraged, Winston fails to rally the French but sees his army safely evacuated at Dunkirk. Supported by the King, the Labour Party and finally by Chamberlain, Churchill delivers in the Commons his famous Dunkirk oration.
“…..we shall fight on
the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing
strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We
shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall
fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall
never surrender”
Churchill moved his audience and this film has moved millions
of others including me. The film
carries a powerfully positive message today for the supporters of this country.
That is what makes it “patriotic cinema”.
SMD
25.07.18
Text copyright ©Sidney Donald 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment