Thursday, October 18, 2012

BRISTOL CATHEDRAL AND THE SOCIETY OF MERCHANT VENTURERS; The Essence of England (2)




[This is the second of a series of articles giving a brief description of each of the 26 ancient Anglican cathedrals coupled with a sketch of a person, activity or institution connected to the area]


Bristol is one of the most interesting cities in England. A great port since medieval times, prosperous through a variety of trades, a financial and business centre, Bristol is the premier cultural and educational magnet for the talent of the South West.

Bristol Cathedral

The Cathedral we now see is an impressive place but it took some 700 years to be completed. Built originally as an Augustinian Abbey on its foundation in 1140, its Norman chapter house and Abbey gateway survive as does the 1220 Elder Lady Chapel. From 1298 to 1332 the abbey was rebuilt in the English Decorated style and the central tower was erected in the 15th century. The abbey became a Cathedral soon after the dissolution of the monasteries in 1539 but it had an inadequate nave and no West front.

A fine nave in sympathy with the medieval East end was completed in 1877 by G E Street, the apostle of Victorian Gothic Revival and architect of the mock-ecclesiastical Law Courts in the Strand in London. The magnificent twin towers were completed in 1888 by J L Pearson, whose masterpiece is Truro Cathedral.

Architecturally the Cathedral is unusual in that it is a “Hallenkirche” (a Hall Church) with its aisles much the same height as its choir – a common enough arrangement in Germany but rare in England. This means it has no clerestory and its windows need to be large as light would otherwise be limited. The other special feature is its 14th century “lierne” vaulting, the elaborate ribbing creating a pleasing stellar pattern. Pevsner waxed lyrical "From the point of view of spatial imagination" it is not only superior to anything else in England or Europe but "proves incontrovertibly that English design surpasses that of all other countries at that date.”

Lierne Vaulting at Bristol Cathedral
                                                 -------------------------------

Although Bristol is some miles from the mouth of the tidal River Avon, It has functioned as a port for 1,000 years. In medieval times Bristol was the third city of England after London and Norwich and gradually it grew its trade in wine, olive oil and spices from the Mediterranean and timber from Russia.

Like many cities, a Guild of Merchants was formed in the 13th century. In Bristol the Guild was notably entrepreneurial and it sponsored the voyage of discovery in 1497 of John Cabot, a citizen of Venice, to the West and he made his first landfall in the bleak north of Newfoundland. Soon Bristol fishermen were regularly visiting the teeming Grand Banks. The Guild became The Society of Merchant Venturers under a charter granted by Edward VI in 1552, which gave the Society the monopoly on Bristol’s sea trade – the Society controlled Bristol docks until 1848, effectively running the city.

The restless spirit of Bristol was exemplified by the writings of Richard Hakluyt, a leading clerical member of the Cathedral chapter, who wrote extensively urging King James I in the early 1610s, successfully at last, to colonise Virginia. The British settlement of North America followed and Bristol was the main port serving America, dealing in all manner of commodities.

By the early 18th century, Bristol’s prosperity relied heavily on the profits of the notorious “Triangular Trade”. Locally made cloth and brassware were shipped to the native kings of West Africa and exchanged for slaves. The slaves were then shipped in hideous conditions (“the middle passage”) and sold to the plantation states in America or the West Indies. American produce, rum, sugar, tobacco and raw cotton were shipped back to Bristol. Fine houses in Queen Square, stately commercial Corn Street, the Theatre Royal and many mansions outside the city were financed by this shameful trade.

The slave trade diminished in importance after about 1760 when Liverpool’s rivalry and larger docks started to bite and the abolitionist cause, supported by dissenters like John Wesley, moved public opinion leading to Britain outlawing the slave trade in 1801 and abolishing slavery itself in its domains in 1833.

The "Nails" at Corn Street

Bristol merchants continued to prosper greatly with “sugar houses” (refineries) employing many, the wine trade expanding and the famous Wills cigarette factories producing iconic brands like Woodbine, Gold Flake and Capstan. Commercial expressions entered the vocabulary – “shipshape and Bristol fashion” or “paying on the Nail”.  The Wills Memorial Tower, completed in 1925, now part of the University, is a Neo-Gothic landmark.
                                                
The Wills Tower, Bristol
The Society of Merchant Venturers helped finance Brunel’s magnificent Clifton Suspension Bridge, completed in 1864, and in due course evolved into a charitable and philanthropic institution, generously supporting schools, almshouses and the two Universities. Many loyal Bristolians from the commercial world continue to be active and proud members.

So Bristol has a very distinguished history. Its Cathedral is associated most strongly with the University and the Council. Unusually, it has a rival in the splendid St Mary Redcliffe, “The goodliest, fairest and most famous parish church in England” in the words of Queen Elizabeth I. The church was built in the various Gothic styles between the 12th and 15th centuries. As it was near the port, it became and perhaps remains the favourite of the Bristol merchants, who beautified it and erected chantry chapels for the priests to say masses for their (no doubt deserving) souls. How lucky is Bristol to have this rich heritage!

St Mary Redcliffe, Bristol


SMD
18.10.12


Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2012.

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

LICHFIELD CATHEDRAL AND DR JOHNSON: The Essence of England (1)




[This is the first of a series of articles giving a brief description of each of the 26 ancient Anglican cathedrals coupled with a sketch of a person, activity or institution connected to the area]

Lichfield is an agreeable if not much visited market city in Staffordshire, about 25 miles North of Birmingham. The Gothic cathedral we now see is the third on the site and dates from 1195 to 1330. It is the only ancient Anglican cathedral with 3 spires which makes for a distinctive skyline.


Lichfield Cathedral
The Evangelist from the Lichfield Gospels
 The cathedral possessed the relics of the 7th century Saxon missionary St Chad and an extensive cult venerating him grew up on his death, bringing much vital income to the diocese. The partly-illuminated 8th century Lichfield Gospels, similar to those of Lindisfarne, are on treasured display.

It was a major blow when Henry VIII dissolved the monasteries and suppressed the cult of St Chad in the 1530s.

Worse was to follow as the cathedral was twice besieged and extensively damaged in 1643 during the Civil War. Charles II provided funds for repair but the cathedral deteriorated in the 18th century thanks to absentee bishops and the prevailing lethargy of the Anglican clergy. The energetic Victorians, notably George Gilbert Scott, drastically restored the cathedral to its notional Gothic splendour, even if they left their characteristic imprint.

There is still much to enjoy – a fine nave, an impressive octagonal chapter house, rare 16th century Flemish glass donated by a later benefactor, a pretty, unspoilt Close and a West front packed with figures of saints and kings (even if unkind critics have likened the curled machine-perfect images to an advertisement for a Victorian hairdresser!). It is most assuredly worth a visit.

-                                        ---------------------------

The heyday of the city of Lichfield was the 18th century as it was a coaching terminus, a place of inns, livery stables and associated trades.

Samuel Johnson (1709-1784) was the son of Michael Johnson, an amiable but improvident bookseller in Lichfield. Samuel Johnson was a very odd personality. His birth was difficult and he grew to be a large, rambling,  short-sighted character afflicted by scrofula (a tuberculous swelling of the lymph nodes in the neck) and uncontrollable tics, making him twitch at every opportunity. Modern medical science diagnoses Tourette Syndrome. He was also prey to regular bouts of severe depression.

Johnson's Statue at Market Square, Lichfield
 Despite these difficulties, Johnson read feverishly and became a prodigy. He went to Pembroke College, Oxford for a year but could not afford to continue. At the age of 25 he married a lady 21 years older, Tetty Porter, whom he loved dearly. Attempts to work as a schoolmaster and start a school near Lichfield failed and with his pupil David Garrick he walked to London in 1737. Garrick went on to become London’s favourite actor while Johnson was a penniless hack writer in Grub Street, taking what work he could.

His first major works were the poem London, published anonymously, his Life of Savage and his play Irene, which only ran for 9 nights when Garrick eventually produced it. He built up a reputation as a writer of ephemeral pieces and was commissioned in 1746 to compile a dictionary. After 9 years of immense solo labour, A Dictionary of the English Language appeared in 1755, bringing Johnson recognition, a pension a few years later and literary immortality. He was not above having a few digs at the Scots; “Oats: a grain which is generally given to horses but in Scotland it supports the people”. He soon embarked on the writing of moral essays under the name of The Rambler and The Idler, some of his finest work. Later he produced an edition of Shakespeare and his Lives of the Poets confirming his status as a great critic.



Short-sighted Samuel Johnson
 Johnson was a convivial person and dined with the leading intellectuals of the day, including Goldsmith, Reynolds, Gibbon, Garrick and Burke at “The Club”. As ever, he dominated the conversation “Sir, when a man is tired of London, he is tired of Life; for there is in London all that life can afford”.

His wife Tetty had died in 1752 and he never married again; “A second marriage: the triumph of hope over experience”. He was not impervious to the attractions of women but avoided temptation, remarking to Garrick: "I'll come no more behind your scenes, David; for the silk stockings and white bosoms of your actresses excite my amorous propensities".

Johnson never forgot Lichfield – he kept up a long friendship with his step-daughter Lucy Porter – nor did he entirely lose his Staffordshire accent. Garrick sometimes used to mimic him, squeezing a lemon into a punch-bowl, with uncouth gesticulations, looking round the company, and calling out, 'Who's for Poonsh?'

In 1763 Johnson befriended the 22 year-old Scotsman James Boswell, “a bigot and a sot” thought Macaulay, though a literary hero to me. The introduction famously did not go well;
[Boswell:] "Mr. Johnson, I do indeed come from Scotland, but I cannot help it."
[Johnson:] "That, Sir, I find, is what a very great many of your countrymen cannot help."

They were to meet regularly over the ensuing years and in 1773 Johnson accompanied Boswell on his Journey to the Western Isles of Scotland, helping to soften his bantering prejudices against Scotsmen.

Johnson also became a close friend of brewer and MP Henry Thrale and his wife Hester and regularly stayed with them in Southwark until Thrale died in 1781. Johnson’s London household was odd containing various outsiders including blind poetess Anna Williams, a doctor for the poor, Robert Levet, and his negro servant Francis Barber, all of whom he treated with notable charity.

Boswell's Statue in Market Square, Lichfield
Boswell’s last meeting with Johnson was in June  1784 and saying farewell, Johnson “...without looking back, sprang away with a kind of pathetic briskness”. Johnson died in December 1784. Boswell’s wonderful Life of Johnson appeared in 1791. It is more than an ordinary biography as it faithfully records the vigorous and enlivening conversation of Johnson. Boswell’s statue is opposite that of Johnson in Lichfield and it is only right that the greatest Man of Letters England has produced should face the author of the finest biography in the English language.

SMD
16.10.12

Text copyright © Sidney Donald 2012







Friday, October 12, 2012

TURKISH DELIGHTS




Turkey may not be everyone’s favourite country – ask the Syrians, the Russians and many Arabs – but one cliché is currently biting the dust; the Greeks, a traditional enemy, are suddenly loving the Turks. They have become totally obsessed with watching endless Turkish TV soaps. Each series has about 80 1-hour episodes, shown daily every weekday. My dear wife is a great fan but not just her; the conversation between ladies in every venue, shop, taverna and office is “Does Ali love Mellek?” “Will Suleiman realise that Hurrem is innocent of murder?” (not innocent of much else, as far as I can see) or “Can Sila win over Boran’s horrible mother?” Thus a nation, which is supposed to be concentrating on meeting the Troika’s brutal eurozone exactions, finds escapist solace in lurid drama and intrigue.

I am not sure if these soaps are helpful to Turkey’s image in the outside world. Forbidden Love an everyday story of adultery, duplicity and suicide involves a rich modern family, a cuckolded husband and pretty wife waited on by a lively bunch of untrustworthy servants and chauffeurs, in a splendid house with a view you would kill for over the Bosphorus. The production values are high and it could all be happening in Rome or Madrid. The doomed heroine is also easy on the eye.

                                    Beren Saat, heroine of Forbidden Love

Decidedly less cosmopolitan, but perhaps more realistic, is Sila, set in provincial Turkey. My ability to follow the tortuous plot, even if I wanted to, is limited by my feeble Greek – the soaps all have Turkish dialogue with Greek sub-titles.

Sila is a pretty modern girl with her own business who somehow gets forced into marriage to a provincial clan chief (Aga) called Boran, a powerful and handsome chap who comes to love Sila. His sinister mother and father plan to kill her after she gives birth to an heir and there is a horrible set of sub-plots involving honour-killing and straight assassination, often triggered off by land disputes. Everyone carries a gun and there is not a policeman within sight. The treatment of women throughout is appalling and, if remotely accurate, would cause radicals like Polly Toynbee and Ségolène Royal to have kittens and instantly campaign for Turkey’s exclusion from any contact with the EU or indeed from civilised society altogether.
 
Boran and heroine Sila

Somewhere in the middle of these extremes lies Asi a family saga involving an early suicide by a wronged woman, the later loves and quarrelsome affairs of her offspring, legacies, land disputes and the usual murder, weddings (the groom arrested for suspected homicide), divorce and (I expect as the series has not ended) loving reconciliation. It mainly happens in an agricultural setting and since Asi is a vet, she often has her arm up the nether regions of a cow and wears unflattering woollen jumpers and heavy boots. But the actress playing Asi is pretty, her lover Demir is handsome and the plangent Turkish music is atmospherically memorable.

Asi's lover Demir (Murat Yeldrim)
   









Asi played by Tuba Buyukustun

  







I watch this series fitfully and with limited comprehension. Its picture of Turkey is rather a mixed bag, with relatively honourable citizens living rather complicated lives, but local gangsters playing a prominent and seemingly accepted role. Coronation Street, it ain’t.

 At the moment the Mummy and Daddy of Turkish soaps is Suleiman the Magnificent, a costume drama loosely based on the reign of the greatest Ottoman Emperor Suleiman (1494-1566).  Although it touches upon his extensive conquests, it is mainly concerned with Suleiman’s restless love-life within the palace, between wives and harem girls, viziers and eunuchs and enough venomous intrigue to last a lifetime. Poison fur coats, garrottes, deadly potions and hidden daggers have already featured and we are not half-way through. The main story is Suleiman’s obsession with harem-girl Hurrem (nee Roxelana), a red-headed Ruthenian, whom he eventually married. It all makes for compulsive viewing.

Hurrem (Roxelana) and Suleiman the Magnificent

There have been many complaints in Turkey about this series – Prime Minister Erdogan said the series infringed the privacy of a revered figure, rather far-fetched for someone who died in 1566! I would have thought the series enhances the image of Turkey in that it reminds us of the martial qualities of the Ottomans, with the contemporary moral – Do not cross the Turks!

Meanwhile, let the Greeks enjoy their Turkish fantasies. Real life for them is all too grim.



SMD
12.10.12

Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2012

Monday, October 8, 2012

CHINA IN THE POST-WAR WORLD




[This is the last of 6 Articles I have written on the respective positions of Britain, the US, France, Germany, Russia and China in the Post-War World]

Leaders of the Republic of China (ROC) until 1949 and of the Peoples’ Republic of China (PRC) thereafter.

1925-49 Chiang Kai Shek                    1978-92 Deng Xiaoping
1949-76 Mao Zedong (Mao Tse-tung) 1992-2002 Jiang Zemin
1976-78 Hua Guofeng                         2002-        Hu Jintao

China in 1945

1945 was not quite so pivotal a date to China as it was to the other powers. To be sure the Japanese, invaders of China since 1931 and heavily engaged in hostilities within China from 1937, were finally defeated; only as late as 1947 had they withdrawn completely. They had caused immense suffering. It is one of the many ironies of China that the Japanese felt an obligation to Chiang Kai Shek for years thereafter for the chivalrous way he treated Japanese soldiers – Chiang had been trained militarily by the Japanese and knew many senior Japanese officers personally.

Chiang Kai Shek and Mao Zedong in 1942
 The civil war between the Nationalist Kuomintang Party (KMT) of Chiang Kai Shek and Mao Zedong’s Communist Party (CPC) was resumed after attempts at peaceful reconciliation failed. The war had been fought intermittently since 1926, when Chiang had lethally purged the Communists in Shanghai, who were then attached to the Left of the KMT. The Long March, when the remnants of the Communists fled to Shaanxi had followed after many campaigns in 1934. From 1937 the warring factions called a truce to face the Japanese together, but a clandestine war continued. The KMT alienated the people with its corruption and incompetence and the Communists seized most of China after 1945. The KMT capital, Chongqing (Chungking), fell in 1949 and the Nationalists withdrew to the former Japanese colony of Taiwan (Formosa), where they remain.


China under Mao

Mao can be credited with unifying mainland China after decades of division. The European concessions in Shanghai and other ports were swept away and only colonial Hong Kong and Macau awaited reincorporation. The West was generally hostile to Mao. He revered Stalin and fortified the USSR in the Cold War. He intervened in Korea to save the North in its attack on the South in 1950, and assisted Ho Chi Minh in his struggle against the French in Vietnam. China retreated behind a “Bamboo Curtain”, closing down trading connections and refusing substantive diplomatic relations; with Britain, for example, contact was only at chargé d’affaires level from 1954 to 1972, despite full British recognition of the PRC since 1950. The US took a tougher line, only recognising Chiang’s ROC as the legitimate government, stationing a fleet to defend Taiwan and turning Japan into a vast US base. Détente between China and the US did not come until Nixon and Kissinger’s initiative in 1972.

Mao was a Communist ideologue and, given absolute power, he set about trying to mould China into his fantasy world-view. The results were disastrous.

Mao, "The Great Leader"
 The collectivisation of Chinese agriculture was being gradually introduced in the 1950s. In 1958 Mao announced The Great Leap Forward involving the forcible collectivisation of all farms, large industrial investment and the production of steel in back-yard furnaces. With no private incentive to produce food, agricultural productivity sharply declined. A famine resulted in which an estimated 30m died to add to about 3m executed or often beaten to death in the coercive collectivisation or who committed suicide. The steel produced in back-yard furnaces was useless as coal of decent quality is required in the process. Despite the privations of the people, Mao cruelly insisted on China continuing to export grain it needed desperately itself, in some perverted face-saving gesture or purported show of strength.

The Great Leap Forward was ended prematurely in 1961 and Mao fell under a cloud in the Party echelons for a period. Executive power was taken up by foreign minister Zhou Enlai, administrator Liu Shaoqi and economic radical Deng Xiaoping. However, using all the propaganda tools of a subservient state, Mao cowed the opposition and bounced back to challenge his critics with The Cultural Revolution, launched in 1966.

Deification of Mao
 This was a campaign to eliminate all “bourgeois” influences, to radicalise the population and to “re-educate” town-dwellers by sending them to forced labour in the countryside. From 1966-77 many schools and all universities were closed, notionally to free young people to participate and join the fanatical Red Guards. All wisdom was contained in The Little Red Book, embodying the Thoughts of Chairman Mao, a banal and unreadable production. Historic sites were desecrated, an ignorant generation grew up and China’s GDP dropped 12% during this period.

Victim Liu Shaoqi
            

                                     
Enigmatic Zhou Enlai



Mao’s Red Guards caused chaos everywhere defying local authorities and police. Former president Liu Shaoqi was denounced, tortured, denied medical care and died in captivity in 1968. Zhou Enlai tried to help Liu and Deng Xiaoping who was purged and sent to a factory as a machinist. The madness continued, egged on by Lin Biau, defence minister and chosen successor of Mao and by Mao’s 4th wife, the infamous virago Jiang Qing.

Plotter Lin Biau
Fanatic Jiang Qing
                                        

                                                               


By 1971, things were falling apart for Mao. In an episode still cloaked in mystery, Lin Biau was said to have mounted a coup against Mao and died when his plane crashed in Mongolia en route for Russia. Much of the energy left the Cultural Revolution although it lasted until 1976. Détente with the US was achieved in 1972 but Mao was ailing. He lingered on until his death in 1976.

A few months earlier, his lieutenant Zhou Enlai (Chou En Lai) died of cancer. Chou was the most recognisable Chinese politician of the age, a consummate diplomat who had shone at Geneva in 1954, Bandung in 1956 and impressed Kissinger in 1972. Yet his opposition to Mao’s wild excesses had been muted and feeble. Like Mao, he was a conspirator and subversive, familiar with and implicated in assassination and torture: he was impervious to the sufferings of his nation. The West’s regard for Chou was surely misplaced; he was Mao’s willing accomplice: he had charm, but Goering and Goebbels also had charm a-plenty serving their master.

Mao takes his dishonourable place among the three evil mega-criminals of the 20th century, Hitler, Stalin and Mao. There are few redeeming features. Mao could have industrialised China with infinitely less suffering; he could have defended China’s national interests in a rational manner; he could have raised the living standards of the peasantry by good government. Instead he revelled in ideological terror and blood-letting, holding back China’s progress for 30 years.

The Triumph of the Reformers

Ineffective Hua Guafeng succeeded Mao but at least he arrested the Gang of Four, the fanatical Maoist group led by Jiang Qing. The group was tried and condemned (though reprieved) and Jiang committed suicide later. Deng Xiaoping was recalled to office and soon ousted Hua as paramount leader. Although Deng held no formal office, he headed a ruling committee and governed China from 1978 until his retirement in 1992 and he remained influential until his death in 1997. He transformed China utterly.        



Deng Xiaoping, the Great Reformer

 Although we in the West take a benign view of Deng, whose achievements have been prodigious, it may be a mistake to make a plaster saint of Deng. His conversion to “state capitalism” came late in his life, in his 70’s. Before that he was Mao’s enforcer in Chongqing and a trusted apparatchik in Mao’s regime, although latterly an economic critic. Future historians, when the files are opened, may paint an unflattering picture of those years. Unlike Khrushchev vis-a-vis Stalin, Deng never denounced Mao, cautiously opining that Mao was “seven parts good, three parts bad”, a pretty feeble formula. Let it not be forgotten either that Deng in his pomp was responsible for the killing of hundreds of demonstrators in Tiananmen Square in 1989, who had the temerity to challenge Communist Party authority.

China takes off

Deng embarked upon his economic reforms in 1978. China now exports as much in a day as it did in the whole year of 1978. The statistics (whose reliability cannot be vouched) are astonishing. The Chinese economy has grown at an average of some 10% pa for the last 30 years. China is now the second largest economy in the world after the US. Restrictions on foreign investment were first relaxed in a few coastal areas but have now been lifted nation-wide. The largest “foreign” investors have been Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, but the US, Japan and Europe have been heavily involved and encouraged by tax breaks. China is the largest exporter in the world and the second-largest importer. Its vast foreign trade has allowed China to build up currency reserves and China now holds 20% of all US treasury bonds. In 2001 China joined the World Trade Organisation, giving it new privileges and obligations.

The success of industry has transformed Chinese cities and a prosperous middle class and not a few billionaires have emerged. Progress in agriculture has been rather slower and the majority of Chinese are still in the country. Communal farms have been broken up and land reform has allowed a measure of private ownership. China is the world’s largest rice producer and a very large wheat and grain grower. Demand for energy has grown rapidly with China the world’s second-largest importer of oil and a large consumer of coal. Raw materials pour into China from Africa and Australia.

With its huge population of 1.3bn and with about 30m joining the labour force every year, China needs to grow consistently. On a per capita basis China is only ranked 90th in the world wealth ratings. A recent policy change has been to concentrate less on exports and more on domestic consumption to raise this measure of prosperity.

Whatever the short-term problems of shortages, inflation and bureaucracy, China since Mao has been a huge success story and Deng has the distinction of having raised more people out of poverty than any other leader in history – a fine epitaph.

The Future

Viewed in the perspective of centuries, China is within sight of regaining the premier position it held in the world economy for much of its history. Its size in terms of area, resources and population gave it this position. The 19th and 20th Centuries have been aberrations in this general picture.

As the success of Hong Kong or Singapore could have easily illustrated to leaders in Mao’s time, the Chinese are hugely talented businessmen and dedicated workers in the right environment. Deng has shown the way forward and his successors will hopefully shed much of his residual ideological baggage.

The West will always find the Chinese mentality impenetrable and can but hope civil rights, the rule of law and civilised standards prevail as the Chinese giant builds up its strength.


SMD
8.10.12


Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2012




Sunday, September 30, 2012

RUSSIA IN THE POST-WAR WORLD




[This is the fifth of six articles I am writing on the respective positions of Britain, the US, France, Germany, Russia and China in the Post-War World]

Leaders of the USSR till 1991 and of Russia thereafter

1925-53 Joseph Stalin                         1984-85 Konstantin Chernenko
1953 Molotov, Beria, Malenkov         1985-91 Mikhail Gorbachev
1953-55 Georgi Malenkov                  1991-99 Boris Yeltsin
1955-64 Nikolai Khrushchev              1999-08 Vladimir Putin
1964-82 Leonid Brezhnev                   2008-12 Dmitri Medvedev
1982-84 Yuri Andropov                      2012-     Vladimir Putin
                                                          
The USSR triumphant

After a brutal war waged since the June 1941 Nazi invasion of the USSR, the Red Army defeated the Germans on the Eastern Front, most of Eastern Europe was under its occupation and Berlin itself fell in April 1945.

The Red Army storms the Berlin Reichstag
 The cost to Russia was however horrendous. It is estimated that 26m Soviet citizens died, about 10m in the military and 16m civilians – about 13% of the population. The devastation in Western Russia and the Ukraine was colossal. Even after hostilities ended there was more blood-letting. Nationalities deemed to have been anti-Soviet, like the Crimean Tatars, were deported wholesale to remote provinces; many died. Returning POWs were called cowards – thousands were shot or sent to labour camps. The Allies were bound by the Yalta agreements to repatriate any Russians in their zones. The raggle-taggle followers of Vlasov’s brigade, who fought with the Nazis, were shipped to Russia, often to be shot out of hand on the quayside.

Eastern Europe suffered grievously under Soviet oppression. The Soviet zone of Germany was the scene of mass rape and murder. Those who could flee, fled West. In Poland, which pro rata had lost more than the USSR (25% of the population dying) an election won by the Peasant Party was overturned by the Communists and the opposition purged on Stalin’s orders. The last vestige of Czech independence ended with the defenestration of foreign minister Jan Masaryk in 1948. In Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria and the Baltics (annexed by Russia) prominent non-communists were exiled or executed; all opposition was silenced.

Stalinism and Terror

Russian dominance was rationalised as a natural wish to erect a buffer area between Russia and the aggressive West but the policy had all the hall-marks of a morbidly suspicious and ruthless mind. That mind belonged to Joseph Stalin. Adulated for the victory of his armies, he was unassailable in the Soviet Union and surrounded himself with equally ruthless lieutenants and many contemptible toadies.

Joseph Stalin, Dictator and Arch-Criminal
 Nevertheless the full resources of the USSR were mobilised to rebuild the Soviet economy, which did indeed recover quickly. As “a command economy” its priorities were decided centrally with no reference to market demand. Heavy industry and military investment were favoured while housing and consumer goods were more or less ignored. Partly through the success of secret policeman Lavrenti Beria’s espionage operations but mainly through the native skill of Soviet scientists, Russia began to catch up with the US in the critical nuclear arms race, exploding her first atom bomb in 1949. Beria got the credit, becoming Stalin’s most feared henchman.

Russia also acquired a significant new ally when in 1949 China became communist under Mao-Tse-Tung, who deferred to Stalin. Stalin encouraged Kim-Il-Sung to invade South Korea in 1950 and did nothing to stop China intervening in 1951.

Another prominent Stalinist was Andrei Zhdanov, minister of culture, who waged war on the intelligentsia denouncing distinguished composers Prokofiev, Shostakovich and Khachatourian for “formalism”. Lethal power struggles, engulfed senior ministers, often stirred up by Stalin himself. Molotov, Mikoyan, Malenkov and Kaganovitch dropped in and out of favour and feared for their (and sometimes their wives’) lives. In 1948 Stalin was defied by Josip Tito of Yugoslavia, the only independent Communist regime in the early post-war years. Stalin accused some Eastern European communist leaders of “Titoism” and was instrumental in the fall and execution of the Czech deputy leader Rudolf Slansky in a 1952 show trial. Stalin was an anti-Semite and only his death in 1953 forestalled a planned deadly purge of Jews arising from a wholly fabricated “Doctors’ Plot”.

When arch-criminal Stalin died in March 1953 there was a short-lived “troika” in the Russian tradition of Molotov, Malenkov and Beria. After anti-Soviet riots in East Berlin, Beria was himself denounced by Khrushchev in September 1953, tried by a kangaroo court and with 5 associates condemned to death. A Russian general despatched the detested Beria with a revolver shot to the forehead in December 1953. Thankfully this was the last time a Soviet politician was brutally liquidated. The worst of the Stalinist nightmare was over.

The USSR after Stalin

The troika made way for two years’ rule by Georgi Malenkov. There were tentative moves to relax the oppression by freeing and granting amnesties to many prisoners in the notorious Gulag forced labour camps. In Europe the Soviets unexpectedly withdrew from occupied Austria in 1954, though insisting on Austrian neutrality, possibly a gambit to hinder West Germany’s move towards the NATO alliance. Malenkov was castigated for failures in modernising the administration and in 1955 was replaced by Nikita Khrushchev with Nikolai Bulganin his premier until 1958.

Khrushchev was a vigorous peasant type, with a bloody past as a commissar in the Ukraine, volatile and undiplomatic, but often effective.

Khrushchev wields his shoe at the UN
 Khrushchev and Bulganin tried to put a more human face on Russia by visits to Western Europe and Khrushchev himself had a vigorous informal debate with Richard Nixon in the US on the merits of capitalism and communism. “We will bury you”, opined the Russian. The prestige of the USSR was enhanced by the launch of the first Sputnik space rocket in 1957 and the first man in space with Yuri Gagarin’s flight in 1961.

Khrushchev’s major move was his secret speech to the 20th Congress of the Soviet Communist Party in 1956 in which he denounced Stalin, enumerating his crimes and policy errors. This was a bombshell to many of his listeners to whom Stalin remained a hero, but the promise of less oppression and more openness was welcome everywhere. In time opposition to Khrushchev’s line grew among the Old Guard and plots were laid to depose Khrushchev. In 1957 these senior plotters were denounced as “the Anti-Party Group” including Malenkov, Molotov, Kaganovitch, Shepilov and in 1958 Bulganin; they were stripped of their offices and expelled from the Party, but at least they died in their beds.

The Cold War, waged between the West and the Soviet bloc since the Berlin Airlift in 1948-9, sometimes heated up. When Britain, France and Israel attacked Egypt over Suez in 1956, Bulganin threatened all three with a Russian missile attack; it was bluff and bluster but alarming nonetheless. When also in 1956, Soviet troops intervened to suppress unrest in Poland and an insurrection in Hungary, the West could do nothing. Tensions remained acute, not least after the erection of the Berlin Wall in 1961.

Khrushchev was contemptuous of Western military determination and miscalculated badly when he began to station ballistic missiles in recently communist Cuba. In October 1962, President Kennedy reacted decisively, throwing a naval blockade around Cuba and vowing to stop Soviet ships. Although the European Left supported Russia and nuclear war seemed a possibility, Khrushchev backed down and removed his missiles in return for the US reducing theirs in Turkey. This rash Russian adventure humiliated the leadership.

Mao and Khrushchev all smiles in 1958
 A more momentous division appeared in the Communist bloc when the USSR and China became estranged from 1960 as the Sino-Soviet dispute developed. In part the dispute was ideological; Khrushchev came to urge “peaceful coexistence” with the West; Mao only wanted belligerence. Mao was shocked by Khrushchev’s reconciliation with Tito – “revisionist traitor” in Mao’s Stalinist eyes. Mao lauded the Asian peasant approach to communism in contrast to the Russian focus on the industrial proletariat. .Behind the theological jargon there was a power struggle. The Russians had always feared the Yellow Horde; the Chinese feared Soviet expansionism in the East. As a measure of the estrangement, the USSR backed India when a border war broke out with China in 1962 and deplored the excesses of the later Cultural Revolution and the personality cult of Mao. The monolithic communist bloc was split forever, opening up diplomatic opportunities for the West.

On the pretext of agricultural failures but really in reaction to Khrushchev’s erratic ways, he was ousted and pensioned off in 1964 to be replaced by a troika. It soon emerged that the real power lay with Party Secretary Leonid Brezhnev, although he consulted with Premier Kosygin and President Podgorny, and he dominated the USSR until 1982.

The Brezhnev Era

Leonid Brezhnev
 The USSR developed strongly in the early Brezhnev years. Her arsenal of nuclear weapons steadily grew drawing the West into Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT). Although the US got to the Moon first, the Soviet space programme was impressive. The economy grew at about 4% pa during the 1960s and there was an aura of stability around Russian society. Russian influence in the Middle East and in Africa grew apace. The regime pursued notionally a policy of Détente towards the West but it was assertive in Eastern Europe, not hesitating in 1968 to send in tanks to overthrow the communist reformist government of Alexander Dubcek in Czechoslovakia, later proclaiming the Brezhnev Doctrine that socialist countries could intervene to prevent reversion to capitalism in fellow-socialist nations. The doctrine was even invoked when Brezhnev sanctioned an ill-judged expedition to Afghanistan in 1979.

However by the early 1970s domestic problems crowded in on the USSR. Managing a vast country on a command economy basis required prophetic talents which no country, and certainly not Russia, possessed. The internal contradictions of the communist economic system became apparent. The people cried out for decent housing and cheap consumer goods – neither was easily forthcoming. Some 50% of GDP was spent on defence, a colossal proportion, to the detriment of other areas of the economy. With little incentive to work hard, as unemployment had been supposedly abolished, the USSR had a work-shy workforce; productivity fell steadily, industrial discipline weakened and the growth rate faltered to about 1%. Despite huge, but often badly targeted investment in agriculture, the USSR became a major importer of grain and other farming products she should have produced herself. The quality of health and education services, once a national pride, deteriorated markedly; alcoholism became an intractable problem. The later Brezhnev years were characterised as wasted and stagnant. Brezhnev himself was cautious by nature and he became both mentally and physically immobile as ill-health dogged his twilight years.

Brezhnev died in 1982 and his two successors Andropov and Chernenko were old and ill too and soon died in office. In 1985 a new generation came to the helm with the accession of Mikhail Gorbachev proclaiming perestroika (reconstruction) and glasnost (openness).

Gorbachev and the end of the USSR


Mikhail Gorbachev
 Gorbachev was a breath of fresh air, outgoing, articulate and managerial. He was popular in the West, well regarded by Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. However his period in power was a disaster for Russia. His policy of perestroika involved the overhaul of industry, the reduction of bureaucracy, the replacement of incompetents and the reorganisation of ministries; the command economy continued and free market forces were not allowed to operate. The Soviet economy inevitably did not improve and shortages worsened. Glasnost saw the reduction of cultural censorship and a lively free press emerged. A flood of negative sentiment towards the Soviet Union from its 15 constituent Republics shook Moscow. The continuing arms race with the US and rather low prices for oil weakened Russia further.

Gorbachev tried to square the circle between the communist hard-liners and zealous reformers but it was impossible. Events quickly took their own course. The Berlin Wall fell in 1989 and the East German regime collapsed. Solidarity was recognised and soon took political power in Poland. Communist regimes in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania and Bulgaria had crumbled by 1990.

The USSR itself started to disintegrate. Boris Yeltsin became president of the Russian Federation and its parliament passed laws which explicitly superseded Soviet legislation. Many other Republics followed suit. Hardliners attempted a coup in August 1991 to prevent a break-up, but after 2 days it collapsed, with Boris Yeltsin rallying the public in Moscow. Gorbachev returned from confinement in Crimea but his authority was compromised. The activities of the Soviet Communist Party were terminated. Over the next months the independence of the following Republics was formally recognised: Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, Belarus and the Russian Federation itself. On 25 December 1991 Gorbachev resigned as President and on 26 December 1991 the USSR formally ceased to exist, with the Russian Federation becoming the successor state.

Post-Soviet Russia

Boris Yeltsin in an expansive mood
 Yeltsin became President carrying many hopes but his regime was a failure. Taking advice from the US, the IMF, the World Bank and other Western economists he decided on a headlong rush -“shock therapy” – to abandon the socialist command economy and substitute a free market one. Other, perhaps wiser, heads advocated a more gradual approach. In early 1992 Yeltsin introduced by decree his reforms, ending price controls, raising taxes, cutting welfare and raising interest rates. The economy nose-dived and living conditions worsened markedly. A scheme involving the universal issue of vouchers anticipating a huge privatisation programme was frustrated as the population sold the vouchers for cash, mainly to the so-called “oligarchs” who subsequently acquired state assets at low prices. Corruption abounded and crime rocketed.

The Russian parliament opposed Yeltsin’s measures and defied his decrees. In 1993 Yeltsin called in the army to suppress this opposition and tanks shelled the parliament building, killing 187. Yeltsin won a constitutional referendum increasing his presidential powers and was re-elected in a close race in 1995. The economic shock therapy did not work and the Russian economy languished, leading to a 60% devaluation of the rouble, the collapse of some banks and an international default in 1998. Discredited and erratic Yeltsin resigned the Presidency in 1999.

Putin and Recovery

Vladimir Putin, originally a KGB officer, became Yeltsin’s senior lieutenant in 1998 and chosen successor. He and his close ally Dmitri Medvedev have presided over a successful era of growth and prosperity.

Dmitri Medvedev and Vladimir Putin
 Russia is an energy superpower, with vast oil and gas resources; the recovery from the Yeltsin default was much helped by 5-fold increase globally in oil prices. Debts were repaid and Russia built up large currency reserves. At last living standards consistently improved as the economy grew at 8% pa in the early 2000s, real wages more than tripled, unemployment halved, cheap credit became available. The oligarchs were reined in and an anti-corruption campaign began. The administration was streamlined and the courts reformed.

Domestically, Chechnya was pacified after a long insurrection although Islamic terrorism remained a problem. The West reacted badly to the brief 2008 South Ossetia war pitting Russia against an adventurous and provocative Georgia. Putin has been accused of dictatorial ways: there has been noisy opposition to him and at least two of his opponents have been murdered. He conducts himself as a quasi-Western politician, glad-handing the voters, joining in discussions and presenting a macho image.

Medvedev was Putin’s premier and became president in 2008 when Putin was constitutionally barred from a third consecutive term. He reverted to premier when Putin returned in 2012. A lawyer, Medvedev was rather more liberal than his mentor, but the extent to which he is his own man rather than Putin’s alter ego is unclear.

The Real Russia

Communism, especially the Stalinist variety, has been the bane of Russia. An immensely talented people lived under an oppressive regime and yet her spirit was never extinguished. Composers like Shostakovich were denounced but still produced symphonies. Russian performers like cellist Rostropovich, violinist Oistrahk and pianists Richter and Ashkenazy delighted global audiences. Dancer Nureyev thrilled London whence he defected. In literature Boris Pasternak, winning fame with Dr Zhivago, was forced to refuse the Nobel Prize; poet Yevtushenko heralded The Thaw of Khrushchev’s years.

A generation of dissident writers followed; Yuli Daniel and Andrei Sinyavsky were infamously tried for “anti-Soviet activities” in 1966 and sent to labour camps. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn published Cancer Ward in 1967 deploring the Soviet practice of forcibly hospitalising dissidents as madmen, to be followed in 1973 by the Gulag Archipelago exposing the labour camp system. He was exiled in 1974 but returned in 1994 preaching the merits and values of an idealised Old Russia. The nuclear scientist turned civil rights activist Andrei Sakharov won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1975 but was sent into internal exile; after a world-wide uproar, he was rehabilitated by Gorbachev.

In sport Russia excelled with distance runner Vladimir Kuts winning 2 Olympic Golds in 1956, gymnast Nellie Kim achieving a perfect 10 in 1976 and Moscow Dynamo thrilling in the 1950s football world. Maria Sharapova won Wimbledon in 2004 and Grand Slam titles since, exuding glamour.

Maria Sharapova, Tennis Idol
The Future

Russia was well described as a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. The largest country in the world, with enormous natural resources and untapped potential, she has suffered a 20th Century of misrule. If her economy is sensibly run and democratic institutions allowed to perform their function, Russia will add lustre to the leading nations in the world.

SMD
30.09.12

Copyright Sidney Donald 2012