Saturday, January 25, 2020

SCOTTISH WRITERS




Although her links with England are extremely close and mutually beneficial, Scotland’s culture has its own distinct flavour and excellencies, as much in literature as in any other sphere. Always less hierarchical and feudal than England, while materially poorer, the Scottish royal court historically patronised the arts generously and fine poets of the 15th century like Henryson and Dunbar were able to flourish. The Union of the Crowns in 1603 removed this prop, with the court moving from Edinburgh to London and 17th century Scotland produced no rival to Milton or Dryden.


Despite this, Scotland’s culture prospered mightily in the 18th century during the remarkable Scottish Enlightenment. The novelist Tobias Smollett produced picaresque romps like Roderick Random, Humphry Clinker and Peregrine Pickle between 1748 and 1771 on similar lines to the works of Sterne and Richardson. More seriously the great philosophical and ethical works of David Hume starting with his Treatise on Human Understanding (1740) contributed to Edinburgh’s reputation as “The Athens of the North”, arguing that man is a bundle of emotions rather than a rational being, earning him a European reputation. To this acute intelligence we can add the name of Adam Smith, professor of moral philosophy at Glasgow, who published his The Wealth of Nations in 1776. His analysis of economic behavior and his arguments in favour of international trade resonate still. He revolutionised the science of economics and laid the intellectual foundations of modern capitalism.


David Hume
James Boswell


More riches were to follow. James Boswell (1740-96) epitomised many of the failings of Scots, a snob, a drunk and a debauchee, but he had warm virtues too, the gift of friendship and an acute eye for the society in which he lived. He visited the courts of Europe and befriended Voltaire, Rousseau and the glittering circle round his mentor Dr Samuel Johnson in London and the finest minds in Scotland. His daily Journals from 1763 reveal his merits and failings with vivid candour. Even his sharpest critic, Lord Macaulay, declared that Boswell’s Life of Johnson (1791) was the greatest biography in the English language and that eminence has never been challenged.


As his 25 January birthday is upon us, let us celebrate the fine poetry of Robert Burns (1759-96), whose Romantic and lyrical works endear him to Scots everywhere:


But Mousie, thou are no thy-lane,
In proving foresight may be vain:
The best laid schemes o' Mice an' Men,
Gang aft agley,
An' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain,
For promis'd joy!


…or in a more radical vein:


Then let us pray that come it may,
(As come it will for a' that,)
That Sense and Worth, o'er a' the earth,
Shall bear the gree, an' a' that. For a' that, an' a' that,
It's coming yet for a' that,
That Man to Man, the world o'er,
Shall brothers be for a' that.

Robert Burns
Sir Walter Scott




                                                                           

Walter Scott (1771-1832) was a busy Scots lawyer of Tory sympathies who first became known as a poet. His Marmion and Lay of the Last Minstrel were much admired. The famous lines below give a flavour:


Breathes there the man, with soul so dead,
Who never to himself hath said,
This is my own, my native land?
Whose heart hath ne’er within him burn’d,
As home his footsteps he hath turn’d,
From wandering on a foreign strand?



Scott’s enduring fame rests on his historical novels, a genre he effectively invented, publishing Waverley in 1813 followed by many others including Heart of Midlothian, The Antiquary and Ivanhoe. He attracted a European audience, but his works fell out of fashion, (guru-critic F L Leavis an enemy), in the 20th century and only now are being re-appraised. The ambition and sweep of his plots are striking and the many monuments to him in Scottish towns are a testimony to the high esteem in which he is held.


It is perhaps useful if I set out what I think are the trademarks of much Scots writing:
-         - A fascination with ideas, either religious or philosophical
-          - A strong compulsion to praise (even overpraise) the merits of Scotland
-          - An excessive interest, often tortured, in sexual feelings
-          - A contrarian spirit, both to shock or entertain, fed by the author’s vanity
-          - Radical political views, opposing the existing order, whatever it might be.


Returning to the 19th century, the industrial revolution had made Scotland prosperous though not enough prosperity trickled down to the labouring classes. Scotland had in David Hume a much-read historian though he wrote a History of England rather than Scotland. Similarly Anglophile was Lord Macaulay, with a Scottish father but who spent his life in England (and India). He was thus half-Scot, but I would settle for that fraction of a glorious stylist and an incisive critic even if his Whig interpretation of history raises hackles.


More definitively Scottish was Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881), the Sage of Ecclefechan, who admired German writers like Goethe and Fichte. He was a believer in heroic Great Men, for example Cromwell or Napoleon, and disparaged democracy. His The French Revolution and his biography of Frederick the Great gave ample scope for his eccentric, declamatory prose style. He was a kenspeckle figure round his home in Cheyne Walk, Chelsea, and was a doughty controversialist all his life.


A maverick and bohemian figure was Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-94) driven from his native damp and chilly Edinburgh by chronic bronchial problems. His Child’s Garden of Verses graced children’s bookshelves but his Kidnapped and Treasure Island were in fact adult adventures while Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde famously explored the splits in the human personality.


Thomas Carlyle
Robert Louis Stevenson


Two other Scots writers distinguished themselves with now classic stories for children J M Barrie and Kenneth Grahame. Barrie was a busy playwright but his Peter Pan (1904) earned him an enchanted immortality. Kenneth Grahame celebrated the other world of animals in the touching anthropomorphic tale The Wind in the Willows (1908) with the delightful adventures of Moley, Ratty, Badger and Toad.


A less sunny view of Scottish mores was taken by George Douglas Brown, a critic of the sentimental kailyard school of writing, whose The House with the Green Shutters (1901) described the jealousies and pettiness of small-town Scots life. More sophisticated were the short stories of H H Munro (aka Saki) exuding the languid values of pre-1914 London club-land.


The Great War and the later economic slump changed everything. Red Clydeside revelled in the expected collapse of capitalism, others like the brilliant achiever John Buchan, continued to write for an appreciative conservative readership, The Scottish Renaissance, ushered in by Hugh Macdiarmid’s 1926 epic poem A Drunk Man looks at the Thistle, attracted famous names like novelists A J Cronin, Eric Linklater, playwright James Bridie and poet Norman MacCaig. There was a strong element of Scottish nationalism in this movement, although some intellectuals like poet Edwin Muir opposed the use of Scots vocabulary and championed English and indeed England. A cherished writer from the Left was Lewis Grassic Gibbon whose moving Sunset Song described the struggles of a farming family in the North east.


Macdiarmid lost his acolytes as he changed his political opinions constantly moving from nationalism to rigid Stalinism before recanting. He was the archetypical moaning Scotsman justifying P G Wodehouse’s jibe “It has never been difficult to tell the difference between a Scotsman with a grievance and a ray of sunshine!” A more cheerful nationalist was Sir Compton Mackenzie, who had a colourful life as Great War intelligence agent, a playboy in Capri, a prolific novelist and writer of history and a co-founder of the SNP. Best known for novels Sinister Street (1913) and Whisky Galore (1947), I had the honour of receiving some school prizes from him in 1960!


Hugh Macdiarmid
Sir Compton Mackenzie
 

My knowledge of contemporary Scottish writers is tenuous – both Iain Banks of The Wasp Factory fame or Irvine Welsh of Trainspotting tackle subjects I frankly prefer not to know about.


Taken in the round, Scottish writers have punched far above their weight and added substantially to British and World culture.


SMD
24.01.20 
Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2020

Sunday, January 12, 2020

ASSASSINATION




“Murder, I should fancy, is invariably rather a mistake,” Oscar Wilde has demonic Lord Henry Wotton drawl in The Picture of Dorian Grey, “one should never do anything one cannot talk about after dinner.” This cynical axiom would not have impressed President Donald Trump, no great exponent of good manners and etiquette, when he ordered the dispatch of Iranian General Suleimani, a venomous enemy of the US and the West in general. Iran and her Arab allies have been whipped into an even higher level of anti-American hysteria, aided by the usual suspects in the West, but political assassination is a well-established technique and the cries of horror at the very thought of it have an unrealistic ring.


Donald Trump
General Suleimani

Philip II of Macedon (336 BC), father of Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar (44 BC), Roman emperors Caligula (41 AD), Galba (69) Vitellius (69) and Domitian (96) were all bumped off by political or dynastic rivals. Very few lucky Emperors of Rome or Byzantium (i.e. the then civilized world) died of old age or in their beds and this gory tradition persisted in Renaissance Europe with the Medicis and Borgias stirring or dodging poisoned chalices every day.


Julius Caesar
Lucretia Borgia

















In more modern times maniacs abounded, British Prime Minister Spencer Perceval falling to one in 1812 while plucky Queen Victoria survived at least 5 nefarious attempts in her long reign. 4 US Presidents have not been so lucky, Abe Lincoln (1865), James Garfield (1881), William McKinley (1901) and John Kennedy (1963), all lethal targets. Unsurprisingly, Russian tsars have also been targets, Alexander II (1881) and Nicholas II, plus family, mown down without due process (1918). 

Other crowned heads suffered the same fate – Empress Sisi of Austria (1898), by an Italian anarchist, George I of Greece (1913), by a leftist vagrant, Alexander of Yugoslavia, accompanied by French Foreign Minister Barthou (1934) at the hands of a Croat fanatic. Going down several classes, Hitler, never one for half-measures, managed one weekend to dispose of his ideological enemy Gregor Strasser, his predecessor as Chancellor, General Schleicher, and his rival in thuggery, Ernst Rรถhm, in the Night of the Long Knives (1934). Joseph Stalin, among his many crimes, also ordered the assassination of rival Leon Trotsky in Mexico City (1940) executed (unlamented) with an ice-pick.


Empress Sisi of Austria
Ernst Rohm





















As an instrument of policy, assassination is notoriously unpredictable. The Serbs behind the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo (1914) can hardly have wished the world to be convulsed with a War during which Serbia ceased to exist for some years. Murdering Abe Lincoln did nothing to alleviate the sufferings of the South and the death of JFK only brought deep sorrow. Very often an assassination is a form of revenge – a dish best served cold – as the Armenian diaspora hunted down for many years those responsible for, and senior deniers of, the Ottoman genocide of 1915-18, and Israeli Mossad tracked the Palestinian killers of athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics. Similarly the elimination of Osama bin Laden, organiser of 9/11 and many other murderous sorties, by US Navy Seals (2011), can be thought a just retribution. The liquidation of ISIL’s Al-Baghdadi (2019) and Iran’s General Suleimani (2020) can be looked at in the same light.


Trump pledged that US troops would leave the Middle East and this will happen well before the US elections in November. He fired his deadly Parthian shot to remind Shia Islam that America’s arm is long and it can defend its interests just as easily from its base in Omaha, Nebraska, as it can from its compound in Baghdad.


Osama bin Laden
Lord Mountbatten of Burma


Yet assassinations can cause much grief and injury to what I look upon as the forces of progress. Who benefited from the murder of Mahatma Gandhi (1948) or of Martin Luther King (1968) or of the offspring of Nehru, Indira Gandhi (1984) and Rajiv (1991), other than incorrigible extremists –  or from that of Benazir Bhutto (2007) in the violence of Pakistan? Nearer home there is a grim catalogue of assassinations in Ireland, ranging from the Phoenix Park murder of Lord Frederick Cavendish (1882), of Sir Henry Wilson (1922), of Treaty negotiator Michael Collins (1922) of vigorous Free-Stater Kevin O’Higgins (1927), British Ambassador Christopher Ewart-Biggs (1976), of war hero Airey Neave (1979), of eminent Admiral Lord Mountbatten (1979) to Thatcher loyalist Ian Gow (1990). Many murders of ordinary people soiled the reputation of Ireland in the inter-communal Troubles (1968-98). Let us hope that period of horror is behind us forever.


It is legitimate to dispense death in an overtly military and well-declared conflict. Alas, many modern conflicts are conducted in surreptitious forms in a half-light, surrounded by fake news and weasel words. Novel judgements of danger and hard decisions are often quickly required. Human lives are precious and may our leaders have the wisdom and means to protect us from our enemies without betraying the moral values we cherish.



SMD
12.01.20
Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2020

Sunday, December 29, 2019

FORGIVE AND BUILD ANEW




The United Kingdom has been far from united over the last 3 years. The Referendum and the Brexit debates in Parliament have created deep divisions in our society; families have been split, generations have been estranged and friendships endangered. The substantial Conservative victory in the December 2019 general election has cleared the way politically and the new Parliament will vote for withdrawal from the EU by 31 January 2020. This will end the Brexit controversy and set the stage for a new Britain - an important element in this is rebuilding damaged relationships at home.

The Palace of Westminster

As an avid Leaver and Brexiteer, I acknowledge that it is easier for me and my kind to extend the hand of reconciliation as we have ultimately prevailed and are now tasting victory. Our quest for sovereignty, for institutional and economic freedom, and for delivering the expressed will of the people has been met, although important bargaining on the precise form of continued trade with the EU lies before us. A contrary bitter taste remains in the mouths of the Remainers which will take many months to erase. I have heard eloquent regrets of the damage done to the City in capital terms by the flight to the EU of important parts of overseas banks previously based in London; similarly, many friends have been upset by the weakening of links with a Europe they cherish. For sure Britain will not be unscathed by Brexit but I am sure the positives will outweigh the negatives and a worthy cause for all Britons is to work together to deliver those benefits and minimize those costs.


Our mutual forgiveness should embrace all statements made or arguments deployed which ignored or overstated the factual evidence. Such delinquencies are common-place in the heat of controversy. Insults were traded, which will be regretted on reflection, and Project Fear saw both sides distort statistics – we will soon see who was the greater sinner – but that chapter is closed and we can move on. Candidly, the milk of human kindness flows only so far and we are well rid of Jeremy Corbyn and his coterie, soon enough to be consigned to the dustbin of history. Few regret the disappearance of Speaker Bercow, whose bias debased his office and who, thank heaven, receives no honour at the New Year. Privileged undemocratic figures like MP Dominic Grieve and Lady Hale of the obstructionist Supreme Court are off the stage while blessed retirement has embraced over-rated Ken Clarke. I would welcome a substantial official honour for Nigel Farage, a doughty champion of Brexit, whose decisions have much helped Boris, but he may have to wait.


To protect our well-established two-party system, Labour needs much more moderate leadership to attract voters. These moderates exist and will have to climb out of their silent bunker; a re-alignment on the Left to include the LibDems and Greens is always possible. The Fixed Term Parliament Act needs to be reconsidered as it can, we know, immobilise government. The simple machinery of government has to be oiled – at least we now have a sensible Speaker in Sir Lindsay Hoyle, and the 2013 boundary changes, shamefully shelved by the Coalition in deference to the LibDems, should be enacted, reducing seats from 650 to 600 and evening out constituency sizes.


The Conservative government will have to deliver on its promises to fully fund the NHS, the social care system and to break the circle of deprivation which clouds the lives and prospects of the disadvantaged. It is a huge, but urgent challenge. A focus on the neglected parts of our country is sure to discover real local talent; revive their spirit and large areas can benefit. Longer term educational standards at schools and universities can be made more relevant and more useful to the demands of our modern world.


The future of the Union itself is being put to the test. Northern Ireland’s devolved constitution is not working with no Assembly at Stormont. The Orange and Green sects cannot agree on cooperation, with the UK’s many enemies in the Republic trying to wreak havoc while the UK is preoccupied with the EU. Brussels itself has fomented disunity in Ireland to bolster its cause. Post-Brexit the UK will want to ease border trade tensions, try to reconcile the factions and get government working again, not budging on the Unionist principle. The DUP will have to do more than proclaim a flat “No surrender” but also reach out to Catholic Ireland.


A more deadly threat to the Union comes from the SNP. Well established in Scottish government for 10 years, the SNP is obsessed with the goal of seceding from the Union. The SNP has failed to explain how its huge fiscal deficit can be bridged in an independence scenario, what its currency plans are and what it has to do to re-enter the EU. Tactfully Boris will have to steer Scottish opinion back to reality. I do not believe a majority exists for Scottish independence but nationalism is a powerful ideology and the UK government will need all its wit and determination to mobilise unionism and win this vital battle.


So, the nation faces many challenges, yet the proud spirit in this land is optimistic. We have entered times of great opportunity and we commend this great moment by selectively borrowing the positive inspirations of Ecclesiastes 3;


To everything there is a season:
A Time to be born, A Time to plant
A Time to heal, A Time to build up
A Time to laugh, A Time to dance
A Time to embrace, A Time to gain
A Time to keep, A Time to speak
A Time to love, and A Time of Peace.



SMD
29.12.19
Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2019

Saturday, December 14, 2019

BORIS HITS THE JACKPOT




Glory, Glory Hallelujah! The Conservatives have won the UK general election with a majority of 80 and the government should be able easily to pass the required legislation and withdraw from the European Union by 31 January 2020. This is an astonishing victory for Boris Johnson who attracted massive support from working-class voters in the Midlands, Wales and the North of England to add to the traditional Tory heartlands in Southern England. The political landscape has amazingly been transformed beyond all recognition.


Boris celebrates a famous victory at No 10

The election campaign itself was curiously uninspiring – the issues were “discussed” in the context of mindless slogans – “Get Brexit done” or “For the Many not the Few”. Boris seems to have been advised to keep a low and cautious profile, checking his natural ebullience and his TV appearances were few and far between. Jeremy Corbyn, Islington’s representative from Agitprop, spouted Leftie nonsense, usually unchallenged by the overwhelmingly anti-Tory media. Jo Swinson of the LibDems tried to make us believe she was in close contention for the office of Prime Minister. Noisy groups snapped at Boris’ heels disparaging Brexit. North of the border, SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister of Scotland kept up a steady Anglophobic bile, specifically directed at Boris.


The campaign was thus thoroughly depressing and I confess that in the dark watches of the night I sometimes could not dispel demonic visions of a future Corbynista “re-education camp” or of being trapped in a lift with arch-Remainers John Bercow, Dominic Grieve and Anna Soubry, to awake mercifully in a cold sweat.


But my nocturnal panic was wholly unnecessary. Jeremy (and Jo) turned off the electorate big-time. Labour seats which had stayed loyal to that cause since the days of Clem Attlee and even Ramsay Macdonald dropped to the Tories in droves – the likes of Bassetlaw, Stoke, Redcar, Wrexham and Bolsover. The voters were indignant that their referendum choice of Leave had been ignored for 3 years by the London Establishment and by arrogant Labour, led by a repellent Trotskyite clique. A revolution was taking place – Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive – and it was coming from ordinary patriotic Britons, not from the radical Left.


Of course, Boris’ government faces formidable challenges. After the formal mechanics of Brexit, the UK needs to agree a comprehensive trade deal with the EU – but both sides accept they have a mutual interest in a sensible outcome. We will want to attract inward investment on a large scale, paralysed during the Brexit wrangles, so we need always to be friendly to lawful business. Reunifying our country will involve high public spending on deprived areas – already promised. We will want to strengthen links with friendly allies outside the EU. The position of Scotland, currently run by Independence-obsessed yet well-entrenched Nicola Sturgeon, needs tact and statecraft to return my native country to the Unionist fold. I have every confidence that liberally-minded Boris can grasp all these nettles.


The enemies of promise have been vanquished. Corbyn will soon be dumped but Labour may never recover from this debacle. Jo Swinson has already lost her seat and resigned her leadership, entirely self-inflicted wounds after the LibDems sought to cancel Brexit. The Tory Remainers all failed to be re-elected. Truly we have been delivered from Evil.


Rejoice, Rejoice!



SMD
14.12.19
Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2019

Saturday, December 7, 2019

GOOD SPORTS



My excellent 1950s public school in Edinburgh was rather too enthusiastic about rugby in my time (I suppose it now teaches the French horn, interracial studies and plays a gender-inclusive version of lacrosse) and one of the joys of then going up to Oxford was the revelation that playing games was no longer mandatory nor even expected. No more wearisome scrums, no more communal showers and no more mud-bespattered hair – ah bliss! I was not some shrinking nerd but I soon enough concentrated on darts and shove-ha’penny, agreeable indoor recreations well sheltered from the North Wind and usually accompanied by a convivial pint or three of ale.


I wonder how our beloved leaders exercise when they are not haranguing the luckless electorate. We know that Boris rides a bike, a quasi-suicidal activity in central London, but I have to say his generous embonpoint probably prevents him from enjoying many streamlining benefits; the comfort of his ministerial Jag more becomes him. Michael Gove is a jogger and is often caught gasping like a gaffed salmon as he finally returns to the haven of his front door. What Jacob Rees-Mogg gets up to I can only speculate – I see him practising a spidery entrechat at the barre – whatever, his equable temper is its own reward.


Boris on his bike
Gove running for office

Jeremy Corbyn is not a team player and is, or certainly was, a keen cyclist too. In the 1960s he was to be encountered, all knobbly-knee’d and bicycle-clipped, touring the empty roads of East Germany admiring Ulbricht’s workers’ paradise. Unaccountably those workers were continually trying to escape to the West – not a journey contemplated in Jeremy’s Marxist handbook. Jo Swinson is a sociable type probably into synchronized swimming – her entire party can join her - while Nicola Sturgeon perhaps favours haggis-hurling, as long as she can blame England for any of her shortcomings.


Jeremy mounts his (red) bike

Widening the net, I suppose golf is a typical exercise for the laid-back leaders of men. Its image as a sport is besieged at present as its most ardent protagonist is none other than President Donald Trump. Is The Donald entirely to be trusted, will his conduct of foreign policy by tweet become the new norm and will impeachment proceedings enliven 2020? He will need the best shots in his locker to dodge these difficulties and achieve re-election next November, but we have seen this peculiar phoenix rise from the ashes several times already.


Trump drives on regardless
    
Closer to home, another golfer with a precarious grip on reality is our Prince Andrew, clouded and eclipsed by sordid scandal and perhaps to be exiled forever from the splendours of Windsor and Buck House. He has made a complete Horlicks of his position and deeply embarrassed our revered Queen.


Andrew stuck in the rough for good

The man in the news as I write is Emmanuel Macron quarrelling with Trump, Brussels and now beset by so-called ouvriers complaining about their amazingly generous, but clearly unaffordable, state- underwritten pension schemes. Mind you, if I were an ouvrier I would certainly defend these valuable “rights” – I am probably just sick with envy as I contemplate the UK’s feeble state pension. I do not believe Macron participates in any sport but I see this proud stony-faced figure drawn in a lavish carriage with liveried outriders, waving a gloved and bejewelled hand at a despised mob of Jacobins and gilets jaunes. 
Apparently even his cherished wife Brigitte finds Macron “arrogant” – quite an accolade from a people noted for their arrogance from Louis XIV through Napoleon to Charles de Gaulle.


Brigitte and "arrogant" Emmanuel Macron
                                 
My final sad sportsman is Sir John Major, successor to Thatcher and hitherto well-regarded retired Premier. The convention is that ex-Prime Ministers avoid partisan politics but yesterday Major advised the electors to support Tory Remain rebels, most of whom have been expelled from the Party he once led. This disloyalty sticks in the craw and while Major loved cricket in his idyllic (and disappeared) Huntingdonshire, I hope he is tied in further knots by an unplayable googly or that the ghost of splendid Bob Willis shatters his wicket with a jet-powered Yorker.



SMD
07.12.19
Text copyright © Sidney Donald 2019

Thursday, November 28, 2019

ROLE MODELS




With the great and the good strutting their stuff, with partisan passions aflame and with the venal media reporting and exaggerating every little incident, you would have thought an election would stimulate the oratorical talents of every aspiring soap-box Gladstone and attract inspiring world-views from every village tin-pot Napoleon. Yet certainly my pulses are resolutely un-quickened and my heart beats at its usual torpid pace. The UK elections have yet to catch light; ordinary people have had a bucketful of politics, the faces are too familiar and the arguments cannot bear endless repetition. The electorate wants the poll to happen as soon as possible, for the urgent key decisions to be made and then to be left in peace for at least 5 years.


The central role in the election is held by the party leaders – they must give heart to their foot-soldiers and confound their enemies in front of admiring audiences. Such politicians are thin on the ground. Tory Boris is instantly recognizable and is generally quite liked, but I await a rousing speech from him – he has been ultra-cautious, if not quite as boring as the unlamented Theresa. Harrumphing about the merits of Brexit is fine for the faithful but he has to move minds hitherto closed or indifferent. We have only seen plonk ordinaire Boris so far – we crave for vintage bubbling Boris to pop our corks! A decisive win is within his grasp – go get it Boris!


Boris Johnson on the cusp of victory

At least he is a world better than Jeremy Corbyn, who embarrasses even his own Labour members. Posterity may well wonder what possessed Labour to vote him in as Leader in the first place and then to keep him when his inadequacies were laid bare. Never more than a street-corner agitator, he holds beliefs of such extreme idiocy that even Tony Benn would spin in his grave. Champion of everything anti-British, this rabid admirer of Ulbricht’s old East Germany is anti-American, anti-NATO, anti-EU (but keep that quiet!) anti-business, anti-Semitic and pro-CND, pro-Arab terrorist, pro-IRA, pro-nationalisation, pro-absurdly high government spending. He and his cronies, John McDonnell, Seumas Milne and Diane Abbott dream about the Marxist/Stalinist policy of destroying the gainfully employed majority by confiscating their wealth and distributing it to the poorest in our society. Sane Labour would never endorse such policies, but do not even wait to see: Corbyn is an Orwellian nightmare, unfit for high office and is beyond the pale of democratic politics.


Red Ideologue, Jeremy Corbyn

The Liberal Democrats made Jo Swinson their Leader in 2019. She is a Scot and leads a party of 21 members, swollen from an original 12 by oddball defections from both major parties. Jo was not well-known before becoming leader but she has been in Parliament since 2005. She talks endlessly about many transient LibDem causes not least the imbalance between men and women in top jobs in all spheres. She is articulate and enthusiastic but it is all to no avail. Her party’s USP is that it is the only main party backing Remain, viewed as a dismal, negative and antiquated prospect by most of the electorate. She will have to fight hard to retain any of her seats and I predict a LibDem disaster. Jo, I know it is ungallant to say this, but you must also do something to sort out those un-telegenic front teeth. No doubt in some constituencies she will poll quite well, but the voting system marginalizes third parties and the LibDems will be irrelevant in 2019.


Jo Swinson, LibDem cheerleader

Finally, we have the harridan from the SNP, Nicola Sturgeon. She has been First Minister of Scotland since 2014, succeeding Alex Salmond after the SNP-backed referendum on independence failed. She has administered Scotland reasonably sensibly although her country’s fiscal deficit continues to grow, its industries are sluggish and is kept solvent by generous Westminster subsidies. Brexit has given the SNP an opportunity to reopen the independence debate, a cause well-supported by about 25% of Scots these days but one which obsesses Sturgeon, who can talk of little else. The 2017 election showed a decline in SNP support and a Conservative revival. Despite the SNP’s trumpetings, I doubt if the SNP will make a clean sweep and I believe the Conservatives may hold on to its seats. There may be other surprises from Labour too as Scotland was its historic stronghold. The SNP fantasies about Scotland staying in Europe underline its feeble grip on reality. To voters outside Scotland, Sturgeon is a pain in the neck, spouting Anglophobia and personal hostility to Boris. Her glib chip-on-the-shoulder nationalism is deeply unattractive to many Scots too.

Nicola Sturgeon, hater of the Union
 So, our 4 political leaders are a rum lot and we cannot find a Cromwell, a Pitt a Churchill or a Thatcher between them. As a supporter of Brexit, I naturally gravitate towards Boris. I am now in Greece enjoying the autumnal pleasures of Athens and Salonika and only return on 10 December just on the eve of polling. Happily, I have already cast my postal vote in the Conservative cause and humbly suggest that my readers do the same.


SMD
28.11.19
Text copyright © Sidney Donald 2019

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

BRITISHNESS



This weekend’s Festival of Remembrance at the Albert Hall and the Ceremony of Remembrance at the Cenotaph cannot fail to move millions of Britons, even this year - 101 years since the end of WW1 and 74 years since the end of WW2. The days of conscript armies have long gone but professional British forces have fought and died for us in, for example. the Falklands, Ulster, Iraq and Afghanistan much more recently. Many of the grievously wounded are with us still and all honour to them and to other sufferers and mourners.


The veterans at the Cenotaph 2019
       
These ceremonies are carried out with pride, aplomb and solemnity. The music at the Cenotaph hardly changes but is always deeply evocative – Rule Britannia, the Minstrel Boy, Dido’s Lament, The Flowers of the Forest et al touch deep emotions and all generations share them. It is not a moment for political point-scoring – how glad we were that Jeremy Corbyn conducted himself with dignity, so unlike the shaming distracted look and donkey-jacket scruffiness of Michael Foot a generation ago.


These occasions help define what is meant by “Britishness”, a quality enjoyed by both Leavers and Remainers – epithets which hopefully will lose meaning after the December 12 UK general election. There are extremes on both sides – the tub-thumping, flag-waving bigot on the Right and the over- populated Left of professional disparagers of their own country and admirers of the worst in others, be they IRA, Hamas, ISIL or Hezbollah. Somewhere on the margin are the various Nationalists, ever consumed with bile against an England they willfully fail to understand or cherish.


Away from those extremes is a broad middle Britain, united in love and respect for their country.


This royal throne of kings, this sceptre’d isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise…
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.


I know this is hackneyed and the stuff of clichรฉs but it idealises something almost all Britons feel, the uniqueness of their native land (including Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland).


Firstly, we love the physical features of our country, the glorious countryside and endless coast – matchless Yorkshire Dales, Lake District, Grampian Mountains, Hebrides, South Downs, Cotswolds, Thames Valley, Devon and Cornwall, Snowdonia and Co. Down.


Wordsworth's Grasmere in the Lake District

Then we love our great cities like London, Leeds and Glasgow throbbing dynamically even if beset by the challenges of our society. The smaller towns delight too, Stamford, Burford, Durham and Perth, not to mention fun places like Brighton or Blackpool.


Yet what defines Britishness to a greater degree is a certain mode of life – an innate geniality, a desire to “get on” with neighbours, a protective attitude to private space, a belief in the merits of self-sufficiency and, if necessary, a powerful line in bloody-mindedness. These habits are supplemented by familiar symbols – double-decker buses, draught bitter at the pub, pillar boxes, Marmite, beloved pets and the ubiquitous football and cricket bat.


Pride in our country is immensely fortified by knowledge of our history and by the rich poetic and literary culture accompanying it, only rivalled by that of the French. That history encompasses the Roman invasion, Boudicca, the Anglo-Saxon influx, King Alfred, the Norman Conquest, the 100-years War, Magna Carta, Bannockburn, the Reformation, Civil War, Cromwell, The Union of the Crowns and Parliaments, the Glorious Revolution, the supremacy of Parliament, the foundation of Empire, the struggle with Napoleon, Industrial Revolution and Victorian prosperity. The agonies of two World Wars and eventual victory ushered in hard times, economic recovery, the welfare state and the seminal vote to leave the European Union.


Poets from Chaucer to Shakespeare have sung of this world. The poetic diction of Wordsworth, Coleridge, Burns, Shelley, Byron and Keats has resounded through all corners of the nation. The British independent spirit was most confidently proclaimed by Kipling and its apartness avowed by Philip Larkin who observed “Poetry and Sovereignty are very primitive things. I like to think of their being united in this way in England”.


This British nation is not prepared to go down the road of domination by Europe. We will run our own nation in our own way, while maintaining good relations with Europe and many other nations. The general election will, I believe, result in a firm majority supporting Boris’ deal on Brexit and result in a sensible agreement with Brussels. The outside world beckons and we will seize all opportunities we can.


Advance, Britannia Fair!


Lord Byron's Dark Lochnagar in Highland Deeside


SMD
12.11.2019
Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2019