Sunday, May 26, 2013

BRITAIN IN EUROPE; COMMON SENSE AT LAST




It has been rather a good month or so for those, like me, who want Britain to forge an entirely new relationship with the European Union. UKIP polled a strong 23% in the local elections mainly in the English shires; two respected Tory cabinet ministers, Michael Gove and Philip Hammond have said they would vote to quit the EU if a referendum on membership were held now; David Cameron repeated his pledge of an in/out referendum by 2017 if he won the 2015 election and encouraged a private members’ bill to enshrine this in law; as usual the EU in Brussels shot itself in the foot by having to withdraw ill-considered and draconian new banking capital adequacy rules, not to mention a humiliating retreat after absurdly trying to ban restaurants using olive oil jugs.

Nigel Farage celebrates


                                    
Anti-EU sentiment in Britain, fuelled by Brussels’ appalling mismanagement of the Eurozone crisis, is running high and UKIP is the immediate beneficiary. Farage beats his populist drum with some gusto and he personally has much appeal. Already having won 11 of the 71 British seats available in the European Parliament, thanks to proportional representation, UKIP will surely at least double this number in the forthcoming 2014 elections. Yet that may be the apogee of UKIP. Farage has been a useful gadfly, hassling Cameron and delighting the Greeks and others by being extremely rude to van Rompuy, Barroso, Rehn and all the Brussels gang. Yet in a 2015 British general election, the first-past-the-post system squeezes the smaller parties: UKIP is a one-issue party, despite contrary efforts, and few know or care about its stance on other issues save on the sensitive matter of immigration. The Tories will gain most of the votes dropped by a fading UKIP. 


David Cameron’s hand has been much strengthened by recent events. The rise of UKIP lends credibility to his insistence on EU reform as does the explicit euro-scepticism of Gove and Hammond, let alone past Chancellors like Healey, Lawson and Lamont. As a democratic politician he must respond to the public mood: all he can do at present is to promise a referendum – he can handily blame his euro-fanatic Liberal Democrat coalition partners for the delay. The private member’s bill will fail to get its majority but Labour and the Lib-Dems are forced into a decision on the timing and wording of the referendum. Their manoeuvres to wriggle out will alienate the electorate and lose them votes. This is good politics on Cameron’s part; he can claim to be the steady champion of Britain’s interests. By late September 2014 he will have seen off the SNP challenge with the rejection by referendum of Scottish Independence. The Tories will be well placed to win the 2015 election outright with the Lib-Dems splitting into Clegg and Cable camps and Labour’s Ed Miliband failing to enthuse voters with his ineffable collection of ancient Hampstead nostrums.

David Cameron, playing a long game well


                                       
Cameron is right that the 2015 election will be won or lost on confidence in the revival of the economy and on key domestic issues like welfare and educational reform. The trend on all three is in his favour. After a shaky period, Cameron is taking a grip on these matters: his managerial skills far surpass those of the Opposition.

The Tory Party is famously “a broad church” and keeping this fissiparous entity on song is a great trial. The Tories have long been criticised for “banging on about Europe” but it is an issue central to the nation’s future. Cameron’s strategy of a renegotiation followed by a referendum to resolve Britain’s position is rational, and most fair-minded British voters would give him his chance.

Geoffrey Howe, arch-defeatist, opines that no substantive concessions from Europe will be forthcoming. Well, we will see. I expect Cameron to say that Britain wants the closest possible cooperation on trade matters, the repatriation of many powers and no British participation in banking, fiscal or political union. If the response from Brussels is not positive, Britain may well opt for withdrawal. 

In time Cameron will be roused to give us his vision of Britain outside Europe. It should be inspirational. Our native talent, our commercial and financial expertise, our global connections earn us a proud place in the world. After over 40 uneasy years in Europe, Britain will be living in her own skin again, thinking and acting in her own distinctive way and creating her own exemplary destiny.


SMD
26.05.13
Text Copyright © Sidney Donald 2013



No comments:

Post a Comment